Post-Internet

i still feel, eventho contemplated upon, Post-Internet is still a fairly wrongly-/(un)credited movement. I think u can not conclude a total new vision upon a chosen artist selected by the institutes(deff not the bussiness, i think this is being contemplated and stratigised upon aswell by said institutes) and we need to annalyse which aspects are brought up within this new philosophy. It's not bc u work w media aspects that therefore ur a Post-Internet artist, it's not bc u appropriate online and claim it's yours ur post-Internet eventho the pictures generation ideology is a part of the online experience. It is only relevant if we take the time to completelly put it into perspective w/o reducing it to smth half washed, as ppl tend to do when putting under commercial pressure. That said I also believe there is a makeshift going on migrating from Post-Net... but we can not go but further after grasping what Post-Net in essence is I think... Therefore we can not ignore what Net.Art is and what its characterics are.